Risk Assessments
Comparable assessments, with controls and actions your team can assign.
Comparable assessments, with controls and actions your team can assign.
Risk assessments drift when every lab or line uses a different form. We pick a method, apply it to the equipment and tasks that matter, and write actions that name a person and a control, not a generic reminder to be careful.
What you receive
- Equipment and task evaluation
- Process analysis
- A shared risk-scoring method
- Mitigation actions with owners
What we work with
- Equipment lists and the tasks people perform on them
- Existing assessments, procedures, and incident history
- The people who operate and maintain the equipment
A good fit: Organizations with equipment, lab processes, or repeat tasks that are assessed inconsistently, or not at all.
How the work comes together
Agree the scoring method and the equipment or tasks in scope.
Walk the task with the people who do it and record the hazards.
Score risk and name the controls that already exist and the ones that do not.
Issue actions the owner can track, in the same format for the next assessment.
One method for a shared piece of equipment
The starting point
Two labs use the same centrifuge. One has a written assessment. The other has a verbal briefing.
What the work produces
- Task and hazard list for that equipment
- Score using the agreed method
- Controls already in place and controls that are missing
- An action the equipment owner can assign
Expert judgment stays central.
Scores are a decision aid. They are not a prediction that an incident will or will not happen, and they do not replace guards, procedures, or supervision.
Start with the facility, not a template.
Hourly support can answer a specific question. A site project is the right scope when the audit, the assessment, and the implementation plan belong together.
View consulting engagementsStart with the right question.
Let’s understand your challenge before choosing the technology.