Discovery
Walk the current workflow and measure the baseline.

Every engagement runs from discovery to handover. Scope is written before the build, and acceptance uses the tests in that scope.
The buyer confirms the problem. We review a sample, sign the scope, and accept the work against that scope.
Walk the current workflow and measure the baseline.
Check whether the records can support the outcome.
Write the deliverables, limits, fee, and acceptance tests.
One input produces a result a reviewer can inspect.
The agreed tests pass, or the scope is revised.
Training, a runbook, and a named owner.
Pick the path, then the size of the first step. Detail lives on the service pages.
A narrow scope for one compliance question.
A site scope: the audit, the assessment, and the plan.
An ongoing scope after the first project.
About a week. An opportunity map, ROI estimates, and an implementation plan for the workflows worth automating.
A pilot at $7,500 on a known workflow, then the system your team uses. A chemical safety copilot is the usual first build.
Keep that system current as the sheets, sites, and products change.
A few hours a week on the next workflow, the reporting, incident analysis, and the compliance systems.
Figures are ranges. A site project that covers several programs is quoted once. Vision, predictive models, and multi-site production sit above this path: broader assessment $3k–$7.5k, proof of value $10k–$25k, production $30k–$100k+, and managed care $3k–$15k+/month.
Let’s understand your challenge before choosing the technology.